The latent
meaning behind Hamlet’s actions in Hamlet,
by William Shakespeare, can be a faked madness driven by deep depression. He
is, without doubt, one of the most complicated characters presented in the
history of the dramatic genre. His multiple soliloquys reflecting on different
matters, his metaphorical type of general expression that jars with the
audience and the inactiveness of his persona, damped by his own self,
automatically conduct the reader to consider the factors that might have influenced
him.
The first
act gives us the particular impression that Hamlet’s sorrow is deeply rooted in
his father’s death. His mother marries her brother-in-law in an incestuous
marriage that obliterates Hamlet’s hopes and worsens his emotional situation
terribly. “O that this too sullied flesh would melt, // (…) had not fix’d //
His canon ‘gainst self-slaughter.” (Act 1, Scene 2, Lines 129-131) The
protagonist is completely detached from the amour-propre inherent to most human
individuals. The use of imagery in his speech and the way in which Shakespeare
portrays his speech through an irregular iambic pentameter delivers hints about
his mental state. The effect generated is that of Hamlet wanting to take his
own life or sink into an internal darkness. This idea repeats itself when he
mentions that he does not “…set (…) life at a pin’s fee…” (Act 1, Scene 4, line
65) and interacts with what turns out to be his father’s ghost.
The
appearance of his progenitor’s spectrum definitely influences Hamlet further
into his grief and it reiterates his own suspicions, justifying the hatred he feels
for his uncle, King Claudius. It is around this part that Hamlet begins to develop an apparent madness. "He rais'd a sigh so piteous and profound // (...) He seem'd to find his way without his eyes..." (Act 2, Scene 1, lines 94-98) And it makes the reader wonder: Is he really crazy? It is later discovered in the play, by his own words: "I am but mad north-north west." (act 2, Scene 2, line 368), that he is lucid most of the time. This makes us believe that he is probably faking his madness. His dialogues with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern also reveal us that he has come back from England and that he considers Denmark to be a prison. This sums up to the depressive concepts we had of him: his father dies, he has to come back to Denmark and then he finds out the incestuous relationship between his mother and his uncle. As he himself mentions, he feels trapped. He needs to decide if he has to avenge his father, killing King Claudius. It is a decision that seems to be crawling on his skin and that places a lot of responsibility on him, that he probably doesn't know how to face.
This is a good attempt at a critical view of the opening acts of Hamlet. Your use of carefully selected and well-cited evidence is a great move forward in your writing.
ResponderBorrarHowever, you now need to strip down what you want to say to its essence and avoid excess wordiness as you are confusing your points: your reference to amour-propre, and the 'spectrum' of Old Hamlet are both examples of this.
Your focus on Hamlet himself is very valid for your chosen critical lens. You could make more of this by briefly summarising the purpose or focus of a psychoanalytical reading of a text, to locate your own reading in the context of a wider body of critical work.
This is a good first attempt, well done.